STATE v. KALTNER, 41 A.3d 736 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Number: innjco20120501275
Visitors: 32
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 420 N.J.Super. 524 , 22 A.3d 77 (2011). For affirmance —Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, PATTERSON and WEFING (temporarily assigned)—6. Opposed —None.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 420 N.J.Super. 524, 22 A.3d 77 (2011).
For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, PATTERSON and WEFING (temporarily assigned)—6.
Opposed—None.
Source: Leagle
